I would definitely not recommend Hearts of Iron 3 if you are looking to have "fun. But yeah, there definitely is a learning curve. There are also really informative youtube tutorials and moderately helpful in-game resources as well. Alternatively, if you want to start in Crusader Kings 2, I would recommend starting a british isles games to learn the mechanics. Just start as a medium power and play it a couple times to learn the ropes. (Since Greece uprize in 1821 from Othoman empire) It would also be awesome to simulate the uprize in Campaign mode with a new Greek country created in 1821 if Othoman Empire is not conquered. I would like to replace Othoman Empire Flag with Greece flag. Europa Universalis 4 is extremely complex, but also really addictive and rewarding. I would love to do a skin mod for Imperial Glory. The battle mechanics are quite good.ĮDIT: If ya'll haven't tried the Paradox grand strategy games, I would give them a shot. I actually only know about this game because I played the demo on a PC Gamer disc quite religiously as a kid. Knowing about this from total war is not out of the question. Hell, even TW: Rome was already out before this game. Shogun Total War 1 actually came out in 2002(?) I think. Imperial Glory is better than any Total War game imo (let's not even talk about the derping animations in battle of total war games). Imperial Glory came out in 2005, while Empire came out 2009? The fact that both of you heard of Total War before Imperial Glory is mind blowing. I love working on a great economy in order to fund an enormous, unstoppable army :D It's a shame about the lack of empire building though. Personally I don't care too much about controlling the battles myself, as it's the overall strategy that interests me. Originally posted by Mark, a musical sasquatch:I was introduced to Imperial Glory as a kid through my dad. They have the mechanics you are looking for, though battles are automated and you have no real control over them. Plus the games are focused on only military aspects, so there's no empire building or diplomacy really. Only thing is those games are pretty complex and require a fair bit of effort to learn. You /might/ like the Wargame series, then? In the campaign, battles are forced when opposing armies share the same territory. This is the case in many board games (Risk and Game of Thrones Board Game spring to mind), but I haven't seen this feature in a single Total War game. I like games with the territory borders, where you cannot have your units and an enemy unit in the same territory without it forcing a battle. I really don't like that, and that's completely different to Imperial Glory. For example, in the one I played (which I was told was the closest to Imperial Glory), you had to chase down enemies who were in the same territory as your units just to fight them. Neither of them seem to close enough to Imperial Glory though. No idea how he found it though.Īnd I don't think I said I have never played Total War. I was introduced to Imperial Glory as a kid through my dad. Originally posted by LOGAN THE HAPPY, DUDLEY:THE FACT THAT U HAVENT TRIED TOTAL WAR BEFORE THIS GAME IS MIND BOGGLIN
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |